Tell the NY TImes:
                                The Evidence Isn't Hard to Find...
                                If You Just Look
                                
                                
Yesterday
 New York Times Chief Washington Correspondent David Sanger was the 
guest on CSPAN’s Washington Journal, where he had this to say about 
Building 7’s collapse:
                                
“We
 have not found any evidence so far – that doesn’t mean there’s none 
there – but we’ve not found any evidence so far to suggest that the 
building collapses were caused by anything other than the two airplanes 
that flew into them.”
                                
Sanger
 was responding to a question from a caller who wanted to know why, 
despite the massive billboard standing right outside the New York Times 
Building, the paper of record had failed to “fairly and objectively 
cover this crucial issue.”
                                
Now
 with a senior representative of the New York Times on the record 
saying, “We’ve not found any evidence so far,” it is time to let Sanger 
and the editors know that the evidence is there. All they need to do is look and they’ll easily find it. Contact the NY Times Today!
                                Contact the NY Times Today
Last
 week over 1,000 people contacted the BBC in response to our action 
alert regarding the BBC’s one-sided article on the ReThink911 campaign. 
Let’s surpass that level of support today. Please take 2 minutes right 
now to contact David Sanger and the NY Times editors. Just copy-paste 
the letter below, or write your own. Please be sure to Bcc us at 
AE911Truth so that we can keep a count of how many emails are sent.
                                | 
To: dasang@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, metro@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com 
Dear Mr. Sanger and Editors of the New York Times, 
On
 Sunday, December 23, 2013, you, Mr. Sanger, told a caller on CSPAN’s 
Washington Journal that the New York Times had not found any evidence so
 far to suggest that the collapse of WTC Building 7 was caused by 
anything other than an indirect result of the airplanes flying into the 
Twin Towers. I am writing to tell you that the evidence is indeed there,
 and I urge you to look into it. 2,100 architects and engineers have 
signed a petition at AE911Truth.org calling for a new investigation 
based on this evidence. The following points are just a few from among 
the growing body of evidence that overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that Building 7 came down by controlled demolition. 
 
As
 you well understand, the implications of the controlled demolition of 
Building 7 are extraordinary, since it is integral to the 9/11 events, 
and therefore the question of what happened to Building 7 is of the 
greatest importance. I thank you in advance for taking the time to 
seriously examine this crucial issue. 
Sincerely, 
[Name, address] | 
Thank you as always for your tremendous support.!
                                | Support ReThink911 with a donation today | 
| About ReThink911 | |||
| 
 | |||
 
 
 





























































 
 
 
 
 
 
